The EEOC may award you up to a maximum of $300,000 for proven harm caused by the NRP, including damages for pain, suffering and emotional distress. When we have additional details on the EEOC's hearing process for this case, we will post those details on this website. Our law offices have also been impacted by the Covid-19 situation. This proposal is consistent with many other successful class actions. If you have any updated contact information and have not yet provided it to our office, please call us at 585-272-0540 or email us at NRPClassAction@theemploymentattorneys.com. The Judge has indicated that during the Status Conference we may be provided information about the EEOCs plan to move the claims process forward. Welcome to the USPS Class Action Claim Website. A lengthy status conference was held with the Administrative Judge on May 13, 2019. We wanted to reach out and give a quick update on the case, and answer some questions that have been raised. * We wish all of you a joyous holiday season. Second, the Administrative Judge also discussed the group of individuals that the Agency has now identified as untimely. Please continue to monitor this website for any updates. After we receive your completed, signed Declaration, we will include your NRP file, as well as any documents that you may have provided to our office in the past or with your Declaration. The USPS attorneys sought to use the USPS March 17, 2021 appeal as a way to stall the case further and challenge the Administrative Judges authority. Citing to our legal briefing, the Judge clarified that USPS must pay all charges for the Special Masters. You will also need to fill out the Declaration. We can send you out a retainer letter that must be signed and returned to our office. The Postal Service will submit its response to our proposed Case Management Order in approximately 15 days. Recently many claimants have been asking about the timeline as to when claims will be evaluated. * ATTORNEY ADVERTISING * (For better or worse, the Postal Service has a reputation for preferring delay and continued litigation over prompt appropriate settlement.). Before calling, please review the instructions carefully and be sure to check www.NRPclassaction.com, because the answer to your question may be answered there. Once you return to us a signed completed Declaration form and any other documents supporting your claim, we will prepare a complete claim package (including legal argument) for submission to the EEOC Judge. We are hopeful that these additional resources will assist the Administrative Judge in the evaluation of the more than 28,000 claims that were filed. EUC! No, your 30% contingency fee is only on the value of relief that you receive. Today we had a very productive two hour video call with EEOC Administrative Judge Roberts-Draper regarding a process to move this case forward. Go ahead and read through the instructions we provided and do the best that you can. It depends. If you have not yet received a call back, you may try to call us again, and you may be able to get through. In particular, Judge Roberts-Draper indicated that she reviewed all the information submitted and ultimately ordered the parties to each submit certain information about claimants in an excel spreadsheet. In the coming weeks, our offices will be working with claimants to gather the necessary information for the Administrative Judge. The Agency must complete their portion by June 15, 2022 and Phase 1 Class Counsel shall complete their portion by July 15, 2022. The Administrative Judge ordered USPS to provide certain missing NRP Activity File pages to the attorneys by May 28, 2019. Therefore, please spend an hour of your day to complete, sign and return the Declaration form to us no later than March 25, 2019. The best way to get guidance on your specific legal issue is to contact a lawyer. In advance of the May 12, 2022 status conference, the EEOC Administrative Judge circulated a new spreadsheet with additional information requested. As previously reported, we have filed an extension request with the Judge. Phase 1 Class Counsel will seek further intervention from the EEOC in the event the Agency does not resolve the noted deficiencies. It may take a few days for us to work through this large volume of inquiries, but we are dedicated to handling every question from our clients in a timely manner. We were not involved in the process of USPS accessing Pittman settlement documents, and those documents do not directly relate to the NRP Class Action. The Judge set forth what the opt out claimant would need to expressly state in writing: that claimant is aware that they are seeking a Final Agency Decision (FAD) on whether they are entitled to damages and to how much they are entitled, that the FAD may or may not be in their favor, and if so, claimant has the right to seek an appeal from OFO, said appeal may or may not be reviewed given that there is a McConnell Class Action Remedial Phase litigation. She also indicated that the EEOC intends to send a notice out of such website. We keep track of our clients' contact information, and we can provide that to USPS or the EEOC Administrative Judge when they need it. We appealed this improper action by the Postal Service. If you retain us, Class Counsel will review that information to ensure that you are provided all the relief you are due, and file an appeal if necessary in order to achieve that result. We are cautiously optimistic that 2023 will be a year of significant forward movement on your claims. However, before you turn down any relief, you should speak with Class Counsel to explore your options. We continue to take every action we can to ensure that this process moves forward as quickly as possible. We will provide an update as soon as further news is available. Pursuant to the Judges order, we will present the USPS attorneys with a list of all pages that were missing (or otherwise unreadable) from the USPS production of NRP Activity Files for Claimants who hired our law firms. We have submitted a proposed plan to the Administrative Judge for consideration, but no order has yet been issued. During the video call, the Administrative Judge asked the Agency a series of questions as to their ability to quickly access a variety of information needed in order to evaluate claimants and to produce it in an excel format for the EEOC. We understand that this has been a long and frustrating journey, but as your attorneys, we will continue to take every action possible to help the Judge move this process forward! As a reminder, if you have any additional documents that you would like to be included in the final production to the Administrative Judge, and you have not yet provided them to our office, we must have them by March 6, 2020. Employee Rights Class-Action Law Firm Employers who violate employment laws hope that their workers do not contact Thomas & Solomon LLP. However, settlement is not possible in every case. There is no action needed at this time on your individual claim. As soon as the Judge issues a ruling on our motion for extension of time, we will post updated information on this website. Before sending your completed forms to the Postal Service, please contact us, make a copy for your records, and then send our office a copy. The Postal Service attacks Class Counsel's role in the process, renaming them as "Phase I Class Counsel," and referring to Ms. McConnell as "Phase I Class Agent.". First, the Administrative Judge noted the concerns that we submitted regarding the EEOCs mailing and website. Please continue to monitor our website for more updates in the coming weeks. The Judge issued an order today, providing us with an extra 90 days to file submissions for our clients. If you have not yet received the notice from the EEOC, please continue to be patient for a fewmore days. Unfortunately, we are not tax attorneys, so we suggest you contact your financial advisor. 4B-140-0062-06. Here is a copy of the Order. This is just an example; witnesses should include an accurate description of the changes in you that they noticed. It is important for the information in your Declaration to be accurate, but it is ok for you to provide approximate dates if necessary. Please provide our office a copy of any letters that you receive from the Postal Service as soon as possible. If you have already hired our firms to represent you, we will be filing a legal brief in support of your claim. We will promptly provide an update on this website as soon as that information is available. On July 15, 2022, USPS submitted a spreadsheet to the EEOC Administrative Judge, and also to us as Phase I Class Counsel. If you have questions about the NRP class action claims process, please review this FAQ section. Denver, CO 80202. I was told that I would be sent to work for Walmart; or This means that if you have updated your contact information, including address, phone number, email address, and/or name, through the EEOC website (www.eeoc-nrpphase2.com) or by calling the third party number identified in the EEOCs recent communication, you must also contact our office as well to update the information. Also, please note that not every client is being sent these forms at this time. For example, a family member might be able to provide a short statement confirming what you experienced at that time, and explaining that you were forced to leave your job long before you planned on leaving.In sum, by providing additional accurate information to the EEOC Judge regarding your experience, you can help the Judge understand your constructive discharge claim. We have learned that the Postal Service has begun issuing Final Agency Decisions (FADs) on individual claims, summarily rejecting all relief. . Postal Service, EEOC Case No. Therefore, if you have not already provided us with a Disability Form (Supplemental Declaration Regarding Disability), you must provide that form to us right away so that it can be filed by March 31. You can email the documents to NRPclassaction@theemploymentattorneys.com, fax them to 585-272-0574, or mail them to 693 East Avenue, Rochester, NY 14607. As a result of our identification of various processes and systems that could easily be utilized to gather the information needed by the EEOC, the Agency was ordered to provide an update to the EEOC Administrative Judge within a week as to their ability to access and produce such information. The Judges Order explains that the very question of FADs is premature, baffling and utterly irrelevant at this point. The Judge emphasized that the Postal Service was required to wait for the Judge to issue a decision on claimant relief before issuing a FAD.
Washington Square Park Chess, Articles T